Managing a triple crisis in Malaysia

Ever since the first case of COVID-19 emerged on 25 January, Malaysia has been battling not one, not two, but three crises. Firstly, the public health crisis of combating the pandemic and “flattening the curve”; secondly, the economic recession induced by the lockdown measures; and thirdly, a political crisis unfolding in parallel to the outbreak and resulting in a change of government in late-February.

Dayabumi Complex in Kuala Lumpur
© istock / Rashidee Jamaludin

While Malaysia was embroiled in a political turmoil dubbed Langkah Sheraton (the Sheraton Move)which saw the fall of the Pakatan Harapan (Alliance of Hope) government, a tabligh gathering took place with some 16,000 people from across the region. The gathering led to a large cluster of COVID-19 cases, including some overseas. As of 20 May, the tabligh cluster contributed at least 3,347 cases, or half of the total cases in Malaysia. Despite this initial oversight in stopping large-scale gatherings, Malaysia has in general been quite successful in its pandemic response, not least thanks to the stringent movement-control measures in place since 18 March. 


Economic crisis

These measures, however, have come at a cost. As economic activities grind to a halt, many people are suffering, especially small business and low-income workers. Many own-account workers who have been unable to work due to the movement restrictions rely on government assistance, such as the Bantuan Prihatin Nasional cash transfer scheme, to sustain their livelihood. But the monthly payment of 1,000 ringgit (around $239) for households earning less than 4,000 ringgit (and 500 ringgit for single households earning less than 2,000 ringgit) was only to last until May.

This crisis has shone a light on the economic insecurity of average Malaysians and the lack of social safety nets in the country’s social protection system. Workers in the informal sector, which constitutes 10.6 per cent of the workforce (excluding the agriculture sector), are not able to access the unemployment benefits provided in the stimulus package.

A lack of emphasis on wage support also means that many people risk losing their job; the wage subsidy programme provided by the government is seen to be insufficient for small businesses to retain staff. It is unclear how much the economy will pick up after the relaxation of the extended movement control order, which is now poised to end on 9 June, with the public having less spending power and global demand for goods most likely still low.


Political crisis

As if that’s not bad enough, the political conundrum has added to the complexity. Even as the pandemic rages, political horse-trading is playing out in the background. So far, the Kedah state government has fallen after two state assembly persons switched sides. The government’s serial appointments of political personalities linked to corporations have also been seen as an attempt to shore up political support from allies. Talks about shifting alignments, rumours of more elected representatives crossing over and the race to achieve a majority in parliament (at least 112 seats) have become an almost daily affair and reveal the divides within the political coalition now in place. Other events include a series of leaked recordings, one of which was the internal Pakatan Harapan high-level meeting that preceded the political coup, as well as the dismissal of former Prime Minister Tun Mahathir from his own party. In short, the government led by Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin is far from stable. Much is still up for grabs.

The unwillingness of the new Perikatan Nasional (National Alliance) government to convene the parliament has in a way restricted its ability to respond. In the only parliamentary session so far, on 18 May—cut short to only half a day, no supplementary bills were passed. This also means that there is no mechanism for checks and balances currently in place to discuss the COVID-19 policies and measures introduced by the government, including the 260 billion-ringgit stimulus package. As other countries are doing, the Malaysian parliament could have adopted the practice of virtual conferences or restricted the number of members present in plenary. Instead, all 222 members of parliament were flown into the capital to listen to the royal address and then swiftly dismissed. The short session, it seems, was merely to fulfil a standing order stipulating that not more than 60 days should pass between two sittings of parliament.

More telling, the general public has not been upbeat about having a more active parliament during this crisis time. Despite some campaign efforts to extend the parliament sitting, a majority seems to perceive it as an unnecessary distraction because the government’s efforts should be focused on crisis management. Clearly, people appear to weigh the importance of parliament as a venue for discussing policies pertaining to people’s well-being differently. Parliament is often equated with political fanfare, and the faith among the wider public in the separation of power between the executive and legislative branches seems limited.


Continued uncertainties

The first half of 2020 has been a triple whammy for Malaysia. With the next parliamentary sitting scheduled for July, the drama is expected to last as politicians on both sides will do all they can to gain support and show they have the majority. Meanwhile, the economic recession will only worsen, with a gloomy global outlook, and there’s every risk that the pandemic will strike again if we let our guard down.

More will need to be done to ensure that the government is held accountable for its policies in handling COVID-19. For one, a bipartisan parliamentary committee should be established to discuss related budgets and policies. The government has also just announced the tabling of a COVID-19 temporary relief bill that will include law amendments to address the economic and health situations. Waiting until July might be a little too late. It is important that Malaysia gets its act together before the new normal becomes too much to handle and that parliament retakes its place as an essential service for the country in this time of crisis.



Ivy Kwek Ai Wei is the Research Director at Research for Social Advancement (REFSA), a non-profit think tank in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, established in 2004. She previously served as Special Functions Officer to the Deputy Minister of Defence and holds an MA in International Studies and Diplomacy from SOAS, University of London, and a BSc (Hons) in Life Sciences from the University of Malaya.

The views expressed in this blog series are not necessarily those of FES.

FES in Asia

This website gives you regular updates of FES regional projects and activities across our Asia country offices.

It offers news articles on current debates and a range of research publications and policy briefs to download.  


  • 23.11.2020 | Gender and social justice | News

    How COVID-19 fuels the digital gender divide

    It is high time to act and re-imagine our digital future in Asia.

    more information

  • FES Afghanistan | Cooperation for Peace and Security | News

    On Shaky Grounds: COVID-19 and Afghanistan's Social, Political and Economic Capacities for Sustainable Peace

    A new report published by FES Afghanistan assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic and political dynamics key to the country's...

    more information

  • | Gender and social justice, Climate change | News

    Further steps are needed to ensure a gender-just energy transition

    For the shift from fossil fuels towards renewable energies to be genuinely sustainable on both the environmental and social levels, it needs to be...

    more information

back to top