23.03.2017

Crafting CLS+ strategy

Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung is organising a workshop in Phnom Penh to discuss the next steps of Core Labour Standards Plus (CLS+), a regional project in Asia. The aim of the project is to promote compliance with labour standards in trade agreements.

Graphic: The cost of sports shoes, where SG&A stands for Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, by FES / Kawin Tadtiam

Researchers from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Pakistan and Vietnam will come together on 30 March to discuss over three days their findings regarding compliance with labour rights in global supply chains under different trade regimes. All the studies show that core labour standards are frequently violated. In the garment sector in Vietnam, it is the big brands that take the largest share of the profits. Suppliers respond to price pressure by cutting labour costs. They make up only three per cent of the net selling price in garments.

At the meeting, participants will also discuss strategies to respond to these developments and how to make social clauses a successful means to uphold labour rights.

Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Office for Regional Cooperation in Asia

7500A Beach Road
#12-320/321/322
The Plaza
Singapore 199591

+65 6297 6760
info(at)fes.asia

Contact

News

  • 18.02.2019 | #FeministAsia, Gender and social justice | News

    “Let’s smash patriarchy one movie at a time”

    A movie-rating app developed by a group of feminists from across Asia aims to give space for feminist critique of the mainstream movie industry in the...

    more information

  • 01.02.2019 | Economy of tomorrow | News

    The urban housing crises of Indonesia and Malaysia: Same-same but different

    The large cities of Indonesia and Malaysia are no exception to the trend or rising poor and massive shortage in affordable housing and public...

    more information

  • 26.01.2019 | Networks for social democracy | News

    Mongolia to combat hate speech in online media

    Hate speech is rife on local news websites in Mongolia amid a lack of self-regulation of the newsroom and of media literacy among the public.

    more information

back to top